WPP’s Leadership Reset: Lesser’s Vision for a Unified UK Media Business
Brian Lesser’s Vision 30 strategy redraws WPP Media’s UK power map, scrapping agency P&Ls and shifting leaders into “president” roles. The move promises sharper client focus but also raises questions.
WPP Media has unveiled a sweeping restructure of its UK leadership under global chief executive Brian Lesser’s “Vision 30” plan. The shake-up abolishes agency P&Ls, introduces a new tier of “presidents” in place of chief executives, and consolidates strategy and investment under centralised leadership. For the UK advertising industry, this is the most significant reordering of the holding group since GroupM was created two decades ago.
The new line-up is fronted by familiar figures. Natalie Cummins (EssenceMediacom), Victoria Appleby (T&P), Jem Lloyd-Williams (Mindshare) and Jon Stevens (Wavemaker) all take on the newly minted title of “WPP Media president”, each overseeing clients that map to their former agency portfolios. Kelly Parker, ex-chief executive of Wavemaker, becomes Chief Media Officer of a new Media Management and Delivery (MM&D) division, absorbing the once-separate Nexus and investment functions. Jem Lloyd-Williams also assumes the role of chief Strategy Officer, heading a centralised strategy team designed to free talent to move fluidly across accounts.
In practice, the new structure removes the burden of profit-and-loss responsibility from agency leaders and recasts them as client-service heads. Instead of competing for margin across different P&Ls, presidents are tasked with shepherding client portfolios while tapping into a unified back-end of data, strategy, and investment.
Kate Rowlinson, UK chief executive of WPP Media, frames the reorganisation as a bid to cut bureaucracy and sharpen focus. “Our ambition is clear,” she said. “To have our strongest talent working directly with clients — entirely focused on driving growth and opportunity for them in new and innovative ways.”
The client-first refrain
WPP is far from the only holding group reworking its operating model around the mantra of being “client-first”. Publicis’s “Power of One” strategy, which fused creative, media, and technology capabilities into a single P&L, set the benchmark for integration. Dentsu has long trumpeted its “one Dentsu” approach. Omnicom is consolidating media buying under fewer, larger entities. Lesser’s Vision 30 echoes these moves, but with a sharper emphasis on media’s role in the portfolio and on harnessing artificial intelligence as a competitive edge.
The abolition of agency-specific chief executive titles is symbolic. It signals that WPP Media wants clients to deal with one unified entity, not a loose federation of competing brands. GroupM’s rebrand to WPP Media earlier this year already paved the way. But the risk is cultural: agencies such as Mindshare and EssenceMediacom built decades of identity and loyalty around brand-level leadership. Stripping that away may streamline client engagement, but it could also dent morale for staff who prized the cachet of their agency banners.
Media Management and Delivery: plumbing and power
Kelly Parker’s new MM&D division deserves scrutiny. By merging Nexus with the investment teams, WPP Media is effectively centralising the “plumbing” of media buying — activation, investment, and delivery — under one roof. This could yield scale efficiencies and tighter quality control, while embedding MM&D personnel into client teams maintains the façade of integration.
But there is a political undertone. Investment teams have traditionally been the most powerful lever inside media agencies, driving volume discounts and supplier negotiations. Folding these functions into a group-wide division shifts influence away from agency silos and into the hands of WPP Media leadership. For clients, this may mean sharper pricing and less duplication. For agencies, it reduces autonomy and arguably flattens the entrepreneurial edge that once distinguished them.
Strategy without silos
Jem Lloyd-Williams’s expanded remit as chief strategy officer creates a central hub for planning across the group. The rationale is that ideas, talent and tools should move seamlessly across accounts, unconstrained by legacy structures. Fleur Stoppani steps up as executive vice-president of Mindshare to keep day-to-day client leadership intact.
Centralised strategy is attractive on paper. It promises clients access to “the best brains” wherever they sit in the organisation. Yet history shows that shifting planners between accounts is easier said than done. Clients value continuity, not revolving doors. And while a single strategy shop can enforce consistency, it may struggle to respect the nuances of different sectors and brand histories.
The AI card
Lesser’s Vision 30 hinges on “harnessing our AI advantage” by 2030. WPP Media believes that a unified structure — free from agency P&L squabbles — is better placed to deploy group-wide technology and data assets. Nick Adams’s promotion to WPP Media UK president of Choreograph, the group’s data arm, reinforces that ambition.
The logic is straightforward. Marketers want AI tools that can parse signals across fragmented platforms, optimise campaigns in real time, and justify investment. But AI in media remains more promise than practice. The risk is that in chasing an AI-first narrative, WPP may neglect the human talent that still underpins client relationships. If integration stifles creative thinking, clients may simply seek agility elsewhere.
Disruption, necessity, and timing
Outgoing WPP chief executive Mark Read described the restructure as “disruptive but necessary”. That judgement is apt. Agencies face margin pressure, clients demand speed, and technology platforms are squeezing traditional buying clout. Lesser’s restructure is designed to simplify a labyrinthine organisation and push talent closer to clients.
Yet timing matters. The UK advertising market is jittery: growth forecasts are modest, and uncertainty around political and economic headwinds is dampening confidence. Agency restructures, however logical on paper, risk unsettling staff and clients alike.
Implications for the UK market
For clients, the new structure could mean more consistent service and faster access to talent. For staff, it may feel like a loss of autonomy under the banner of efficiency. For rivals, it forces a question: do similar restructures create competitive advantage, or simply acknowledge industry realities already in motion?
Publicis has shown that unification can work when underpinned by strong culture and leadership. Dentsu’s integration journey has been uneven. Omnicom’s moves remain cautious. WPP Media’s Vision 30, with its president model and AI rhetoric, is bolder in ambition but fragile in execution.
The coming year will be the real test. If clients perceive the restructure as seamless, WPP could gain ground. If confusion reigns over roles, responsibilities, or delivery rivals will pounce.
A model in flux
WPP Media’s leadership reset is more than a shuffling of titles. It is a bid to redefine how media agencies organise themselves in an era of platform dominance and data-driven decision-making. Lesser has placed his bet: fewer P&L battles, more client focus, and AI at the core.
Whether the bet pays off will depend not on the neatness of the org chart but on execution at ground level — in how quickly ideas turn into outcomes, how well talent feels valued, and how convincingly WPP proves that a unified media giant can still deliver sharp thinking at speed.
For now, the UK advertising market watches closely. A new leadership team has been sworn in. But the harder work begins as clients test whether WPP Media’s Vision 30 is a blueprint for the future — or another round of corporate musical chairs.
Thanks for reading all the way to the end of the article! This post is public so feel free to share it, and if you have not done so already sign up and become a member.