AI does not appear to judge a publisher from one definitive ‘About’ page. Instead, it assembles different evidence depending on the question it is being asked.
Love this article! Proceeded with testing your 'evidence architecture' idea to other website types (finance, energy, hospitals, government). Thought being: first try to find out which questions are asked, then which claims are needed, then how to prove them, and finally on which page / content types those usually belong.
No surpise: it depends ;)
But i think this is a good process, a fundamental one, even. Thanks for a solid idea :)
Nice to hear this Ramon! Would love to hear more about what you found, from the client work I’ve done, I can see similar patterns no matter what the industry.
Love this article! Proceeded with testing your 'evidence architecture' idea to other website types (finance, energy, hospitals, government). Thought being: first try to find out which questions are asked, then which claims are needed, then how to prove them, and finally on which page / content types those usually belong.
No surpise: it depends ;)
But i think this is a good process, a fundamental one, even. Thanks for a solid idea :)
Nice to hear this Ramon! Would love to hear more about what you found, from the client work I’ve done, I can see similar patterns no matter what the industry.
I’m working on something, it’s definitely influenced by the ‘evidence architecture’ concept